ReadMeABookvsRetrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ReadMeABook | Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 38 920 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +429 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 | 2.3.260718 · 21 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI scores 77/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI is growing faster right now (+429 stars in 30 days).
ReadMeABook details →Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with
Keep Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI, compare it with