Reactive ResumevsXibo CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Xibo CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #2 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 45 012 | 517 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 611 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 7 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | 4.5.5 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 59/100 for Xibo CMS, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Xibo CMS.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 611 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Xibo CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Xibo CMS, compare it with