# Reactive Resume vs Winter CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | Winter CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 45 007 ✓ | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 634 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 634 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [Winter CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/winter-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/winter-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-winter-cms