Reactive ResumevsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 44 995 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 622 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 10 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with