# Reactive Resume vs WhisperLive---CPU

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | WhisperLive---CPU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 45 007 ✓ | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 634 ✓ | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 634 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [WhisperLive---CPU](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-whisperlive-cpu