Reactive ResumevsWallos
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Wallos | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 5 in Finance |
| GitHub stars | 45 012 | 8 761 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 611 | +184 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 36 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v5.10.2 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 67/100 for Wallos, so it is the safer default.
Wallos ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 34 for Reactive Resume.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 611 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Wallos details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Wallos, compare it with