# Reactive Resume vs vorker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | vorker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 36/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #6 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 45 040 ✓ | 204 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 639 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 36/100 for vorker, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for vorker.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; vorker needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 639 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [vorker](https://selfhost.directory/project/vorker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vorker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-vorker