Reactive Resumevsvanilla-cookbook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | vanilla-cookbook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #13 of 18 in Recipe Management |
| GitHub stars | 45 040 | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 639 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 13 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 | v1.6.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 46/100 for vanilla-cookbook, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for vanilla-cookbook.
If you want the quickest setup, vanilla-cookbook is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 639 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →vanilla-cookbook details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep vanilla-cookbook, compare it with