# Reactive Resume vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 44 998 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 625 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 64/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for uMap.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 625 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-umap