# Reactive Resume vs ubnt-update

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | ubnt-update |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 31/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #31 of 31 in Networking |
| GitHub stars | 45 023 ✓ | 23 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 622 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | — |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 31/100 for ubnt-update, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ubnt-update.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; ubnt-update needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [ubnt-update](https://selfhost.directory/project/ubnt-update) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ubnt-update.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-ubnt-update