# Reactive Resume vs Typecho

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | Typecho |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 45 030 ✓ | 12 456 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 629 ✓ | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 66/100 for Typecho, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.

If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [Typecho](https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-typecho