# Reactive Resume vs Turtl

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | Turtl |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #47 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 45 054 ✓ | 631 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 653 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 47/100 for Turtl, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Turtl.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 653 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [Turtl](https://selfhost.directory/project/turtl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/turtl.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-turtl