Reactive ResumevsTuleap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Tuleap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #11 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 45 007 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 634 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | — |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 64/100 for Tuleap, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tuleap.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Tuleap needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 634 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Tuleap details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Tuleap, compare it with