Reactive ResumevsTryton
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Tryton | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #3 of 14 in ERP |
| GitHub stars | 45 021 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 620 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | — |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 68/100 for Tryton, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tryton.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Tryton needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 620 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Tryton details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Tryton, compare it with