# Reactive Resume vs trypost

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | trypost |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #4 of 18 in Social Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 45 007 ✓ | 764 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 634 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.0.0 · 10 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 58/100 for trypost, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for trypost.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; trypost needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 634 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [trypost](https://selfhost.directory/project/trypost) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trypost.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-trypost