Reactive ResumevsTrinity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 45 021 | 711 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 620 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 4 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 620 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Trinity details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Trinity, compare it with