Reactive ResumevsTRAWL
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | TRAWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #11 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 45 012 | 1 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 611 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 10 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.9.3 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 56/100 for TRAWL, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for TRAWL.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 611 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →TRAWL details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep TRAWL, compare it with