# Reactive Resume vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 44 990 ✓ | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 617 ✓ | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 617 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-transfersh