# Reactive Resume vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 44 983 | 117 655 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 610 | +5 296 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 296 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-tradingagents