# Reactive Resume vs torqvoice

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | torqvoice |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #4 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 45 021 ✓ | 45 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 620 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 22 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.2.64 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 42/100 for torqvoice, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 22 for torqvoice.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 620 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [torqvoice](https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-torqvoice