Reactive ResumevsTipi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Tipi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #3 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 44 998 | 9 708 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 625 | +32 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 5 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v4.11.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 71/100 for Tipi, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Tipi.
If you want the quickest setup, Tipi is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 625 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Tipi details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Tipi, compare it with