# Reactive Resume vs tapflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | tapflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #4 of 10 in Testing |
| GitHub stars | 45 003 ✓ | 1 360 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 630 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for tapflow.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 630 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-tapflow