# Reactive Resume vs Super Productivity

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | Super Productivity |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 45 012 ✓ | 23 237 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 611 ✓ | +997 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 22 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 83/100 for Super Productivity, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 22 for Super Productivity.

If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [Super Productivity](https://selfhost.directory/project/super-productivity) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/super-productivity.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-super-productivity