# Reactive Resume vs SonarQube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 45 040 ✓ | 11 125 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 639 ✓ | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 639 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-sonarqube