# Reactive Resume vs sms

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | sms |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #11 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 45 072 ✓ | 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 671 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | 8.0.0 · 8 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 48/100 for sms, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for sms.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 671 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [sms](https://selfhost.directory/project/sms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-sms