Reactive ResumevsSketchForge
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | SketchForge | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #9 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 45 045 | 1 177 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 644 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 3 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 | v1.0.3 · 17 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 55/100 for SketchForge, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for SketchForge.
If you want the quickest setup, SketchForge is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 644 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →SketchForge details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep SketchForge, compare it with