# Reactive Resume vs seedsync

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | seedsync |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #10 of 11 in File Transfer & Sync |
| GitHub stars | 45 003 ✓ | 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 630 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 46/100 for seedsync, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for seedsync.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 630 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [seedsync](https://selfhost.directory/project/seedsync) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seedsync.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-seedsync