Reactive Resumevsseedbox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | seedbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #50 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 45 045 | 402 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 644 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 1 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 | v3.0.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 53/100 for seedbox, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for seedbox.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; seedbox needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 644 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →seedbox details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep seedbox, compare it with