Reactive ResumevsScienceClaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | ScienceClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #40 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 45 040 | 677 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 639 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 50/100 for ScienceClaw, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ScienceClaw.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 639 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →ScienceClaw details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep ScienceClaw, compare it with