# Reactive Resume vs scanopy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | scanopy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 45 007 ✓ | 5 915 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 634 ✓ | +121 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 41 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.19.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 64/100 for scanopy, so it is the safer default.

scanopy ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 34 for Reactive Resume.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 634 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [scanopy](https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-scanopy