# Reactive Resume vs scalar

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | scalar |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #3 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 45 021 ✓ | 16 336 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 620 ✓ | +147 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 46 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | release-2026-10-28-0d01943 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 76/100 for scalar, so it is the safer default.

scalar ships more often: 46 stable releases in the past year, against 34 for Reactive Resume.

If you want the quickest setup, scalar is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 620 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [scalar](https://selfhost.directory/project/scalar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scalar.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-scalar