# Reactive Resume vs ruTorrent

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | ruTorrent |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #4 of 12 in Bittorrent |
| GitHub stars | 45 054 ✓ | 2 189 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 653 ✓ | +10 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 20 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v5.3.19 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 62/100 for ruTorrent, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for ruTorrent.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; ruTorrent needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 653 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [ruTorrent](https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-rutorrent