# Reactive Resume vs RustFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | RustFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 45 007 ✓ | 35 504 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 634 | +1 772 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-rustfs