# Reactive Resume vs rushdb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | rushdb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #5 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 45 072 ✓ | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 671 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 33 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 33 for rushdb.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 671 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [rushdb](https://selfhost.directory/project/rushdb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rushdb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-rushdb