Reactive Resumevsrushdb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | rushdb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #5 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 45 072 | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 671 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 33 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 33 for rushdb.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 671 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →rushdb details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep rushdb, compare it with