# Reactive Resume vs runitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | runitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #25 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 45 045 ✓ | 361 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 644 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.4.1-build.6 · 17 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | 0BSD |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 49/100 for runitor, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for runitor.

If you want the quickest setup, runitor is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 644 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [runitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/runitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/runitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-runitor