# Reactive Resume vs rsyslog

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | rsyslog |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #2 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 44 998 ✓ | 2 343 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 625 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 67/100 for rsyslog, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for rsyslog.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 625 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [rsyslog](https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-rsyslog