Reactive ResumevsRequest Tracker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Request Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 45 067 | 1 164 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 666 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 2 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Perl |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 666 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Request Tracker details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Request Tracker, compare it with