Reactive ResumevsRembg
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Rembg | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 45 002 | 25 216 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 629 | +77 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 11 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.0.86 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 78/100 for Rembg, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Rembg.
If you want the quickest setup, Rembg is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Rembg details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Rembg, compare it with