# Reactive Resume vs recyclarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Reactive Resume | recyclarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #15 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 45 040 ✓ | 2 145 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 639 ✓ | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 16 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 | v8.8.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C# |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 64/100 for recyclarr, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for recyclarr.

If you want the quickest setup, recyclarr is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 639 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)
- [recyclarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/recyclarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/recyclarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/reactive-resume-vs-recyclarr