# raytsystem vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | raytsystem | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #177 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 149 | 8 552 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +83 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 38/100 for raytsystem, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for raytsystem.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [raytsystem](https://selfhost.directory/project/raytsystem-public-os) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/raytsystem-public-os.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/raytsystem-public-os-vs-tube-archivist