RAWGraphsvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RAWGraphs | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Data Visualization | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 9 047 | 47 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 64/100 for RAWGraphs, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for RAWGraphs.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; RAWGraphs needs more configuration.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
RAWGraphs details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep RAWGraphs, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with