# RapidForge vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RapidForge | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 37/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #27 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 44 | 56 869 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +140 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.15.0 · 2 Jul 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 37/100 for RapidForge, so it is the safer default.

Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for RapidForge.

Typst is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RapidForge](https://selfhost.directory/project/rapidforge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rapidforge.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rapidforge-vs-typst