# RapidForge vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RapidForge | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 37/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #27 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 44 | 47 724 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.15.0 · 2 Jul 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 37/100 for RapidForge, so it is the safer default.

Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for RapidForge.

Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RapidForge](https://selfhost.directory/project/rapidforge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rapidforge.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rapidforge-vs-text-generation-webui