RapidForgevsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RapidForge | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 37/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #27 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 44 | 47 723 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.15.0 · 2 Jul 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 37/100 for RapidForge, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for RapidForge.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).
RapidForge details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep RapidForge, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with