# RapidForge vs sglang

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RapidForge | sglang |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 37/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #27 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 44 | 38 323 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 941 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.15.0 · 2 Jul 2026 | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sglang scores 86/100 against 37/100 for RapidForge, so it is the safer default.

sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for RapidForge.

If you want the quickest setup, RapidForge is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.

sglang is growing faster right now (+1 941 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RapidForge](https://selfhost.directory/project/rapidforge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rapidforge.md)
- [sglang](https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rapidforge-vs-sglang