# RapidForge vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RapidForge | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 37/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #27 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 44 | 45 023 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 622 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.15.0 · 2 Jul 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 37/100 for RapidForge, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for RapidForge.

If you want the quickest setup, RapidForge is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RapidForge](https://selfhost.directory/project/rapidforge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rapidforge.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rapidforge-vs-reactive-resume