RapidForgevsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RapidForge | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 37/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #27 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 44 | 45 023 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 622 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 34 |
| Latest release | v0.15.0 · 2 Jul 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 37/100 for RapidForge, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for RapidForge.
If you want the quickest setup, RapidForge is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).
RapidForge details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep RapidForge, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with