RainbondvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Rainbond | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in PaaS | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 6 284 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 9 |
| Latest release | v6.10.0-release · 27 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Rainbond and Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes score the same (64/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Rainbond ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
If you want the quickest setup, Rainbond is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Rainbond details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →