Rainbondvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Rainbond | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in PaaS | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 284 | 114 268 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 520 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 8 |
| Latest release | v6.10.0-release · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 64/100 for Rainbond, so it is the safer default.
Rainbond ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, Rainbond is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 520 stars in 30 days).
Rainbond details →supabase details →